Judge Sued for Handcuffing Teenager who Fell Asleep on Field Trip to Detroit Courtroom

Article Sponsored by:

SPACE AVAILABLE FOR SPONSORS!

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:

Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence

Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?

Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:

May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf

Click the button below to sponsor our articles:

Sponsor Our Articles

Teen Handcuffed for Sleeping in Detroit Courtroom: Mother Sues Judge

In a startling event that unfolded in Detroit, a 15-year-old girl at a courtroom for a field trip found herself handcuffed for falling asleep during the proceedings. The incident occurred on August 13 in the 36th District Court courtroom overseen by Judge Kenneth King. Following the incident, the girl’s mother filed a lawsuit against the judge, labeling his actions as inappropriate and reproachable.

The Incident in Detail

During the court proceedings, the teenager fell asleep, causing a stir in the courtroom and attracting the judge’s wrath. When the young girl slipped into slumber the second time around, Judge King took a severe step of handcuffing her, thereby, subjecting her to humiliation in front of her peers. The incident, broadcasted on YouTube as part of court proceedings, garnered widespread coverage and public attention, explains James Harrington, an attorney at Fieger Law Firm who is handling the case.

Public Outrage and Legal Action

“This is a very troubling case and what we had is a member of our bench who succeeded in berating, humiliating, and effectively incarcerating a 15-year-old child,” lamented Harrington at a press conference announcing the lawsuit. The attorney further added, “This was not just reality, but a terrifying ordeal for her. A person in a position of power and trust threatened her with jail time and even went to the extent of placing her in handcuffs.”

The lawsuit, lodged in a federal court in Detroit, accuses Judge King, the security guards present in the courtroom, and two court officers of several charges. The charges, as per the lawsuit, include malicious prosecution, false arrest, unlawful arrest and prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and invasion of privacy. The plaintiffs, however, gave no specific estimate for the damages they sought.

The Defendant’s Response

Reacting to the case, Todd Perkins, the attorney for Judge King, refrained from making any specific comments linked to the lawsuit. However, he expressed his belief that King, who he accompanied during law school, has always endeavored to safeguard children. Perkins conveyed that King expressed remorse and apologised if the incident had caused any harm to the young girl. He added that King desires only the best outcomes for all youngsters, who represent our future.

Judge’s Actions Recounted

The 15-year-old girl was a visitor in the courtroom as part of a field trip organised by the nonprofit, The Greening of Detroit. Court was not in session at the time, but Judge King was delivering a guest lecture as part of the vocational training program by the nonprofit.

According to the lawsuit, the judge mocked the justice system, conducting a “fake trial” with her classmates, serving as jurors while simultaneously being his audience. The girl was required to change into the uniforms worn by prisoners in Wayne County after being ordered to be jailed. This was followed by a staged jury of public opinion to decide whether to let her go home to her parents or serve time in juvenile jail.

Mother’s Outrage

The teen’s mother, Latoreya Till, said her daughter has experienced severe humiliation and emotional distress following the incident. Till expressed her disbelief and shock over Judge King’s actions and yearns for justice for her daughter. Her daughter now fears going out or engaging with anyone outside their family, she conveyed.

The Legal Standpoint

Harrington strongly expressed that Judge King’s actions do not warrant any immunity. He pointed out that immunity applies only when a judge is presiding over a court proceeding, not otherwise. King’s actions, Harrington stressed, were extracurricular and not part of a court proceeding. The implications following this action remain to be seen in the coming days.


Author: HERE Novi

HERE Novi

Share
Published by
HERE Novi

Recent Posts

Bitcoin ATM Scams Surge in Michigan: A Consumer Alert

News Summary Residents in Michigan are facing an alarming rise in Bitcoin ATM scams, targeting…

3 hours ago

Fennville, Michigan Welcomes New U.S. Ambassador to Canada

News Summary Fennville, Michigan, is buzzing after the Senate confirmed Pete Hoekstra as the new…

3 hours ago

Michigan’s Manufacturing Revival Amidst Tariff Challenges

News Summary Governor Gretchen Whitmer's recent address highlights the urgent need for bipartisan cooperation to…

3 hours ago

House Votes to Reverse Overdraft Fee Regulation

News Summary The House of Representatives voted 217-211 to overturn a rule limiting bank overdraft…

5 hours ago

Judge Rules Against Newsmax in Dominion Case

News Summary A Delaware judge ruled that Newsmax defamed Dominion Voting Systems by falsely alleging…

5 hours ago

Recall Alert for Cabot Creamery Butter in Seven States

News Summary The U.S. FDA has announced a recall of Cabot Creamery Extra Creamy Premium…

5 hours ago